Nikon Coolpix P · on sale September 2005

The Nikon Coolpix P2: a $399.95 compact with Wi-Fi built in

Sold under one name, the Coolpix P2, in the sources we read. Its 8-megapixel twin was the Coolpix P1.

The silver Nikon Coolpix P2 from the front, with its Wi-Fi Certified, 5.1 megapixel and 3.5x zoom stickers.
The silver Nikon Coolpix P2 from the front, with its Wi-Fi Certified, 5.1 megapixel and 3.5x zoom stickers. Linedwell · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Commons

In September 2005 Nikon launched a 5.1-megapixel compact with a radio inside it. Five contemporary reviews found it easy to use and four liked its pictures; the radio is where they split.

Launched
September 2005
Launch price
$399.95 (US list); the UK price was £279.9913
Sensor
5.1 MP CCD
Lens
36–126 mm, 3.5×
Card
SD
Battery
EN-EL8

Specs and sources

Updated · 12 cited sources · AI-assisted draft, checked against its sources by a person (how we work)

Nikon Coolpix P2 specs: sensor, lens, battery, memory card and cable

The Nikon Coolpix P2 came out in September 2005 at $399.95 as a 5.1 MP CCD compact with a 36–126 mm (35 mm equivalent) 3.5× zoom lens. It takes SD cards and runs on the EN-EL8 battery. Sources

Sensor
CCD, 1/1.8", 5.1 MP source
Lens
36–126 mm equivalent, 3.5× zoom source
Memory card
SD source
Battery
EN-EL8 source
USB / A/V cable
UC-E6, EG-CP14 Confirmed · all Nikon cables

Meet the camera

Pocket-lint called the P2 "a tad underwhelming to look at", a plain-lined body beside the style-driven ultra-compacts of the day.7 Imaging Resource described a camera slightly taller than a credit card and just about as wide, a little under an inch and a half thick, weighing 189 grams with battery and card; Nikon gives 91 by 60 by 39 millimetres and 170 grams without them.42 Whether that was pocketable depended on who held it. Imaging Resource called it designed for shirt pockets and small purses, while Macworld found it, at 1.5 inches thick, a little too chunky for a pocket.48 Both judged the build solid: Macworld said well built and robust, Imaging Resource called the body rugged metal, and WiFi Planet thought only the mode dial somewhat delicate.846

Nikon Inc. announced the P2 and the P1 on 1 September 2005 as, in its words, "the world's first digital cameras with built-in Wi-Fi capabilities". The P2's suggested price was $399.95, with sales from September; a wireless printer adapter, the PD-10, followed in October at $49.95.1 Imaging Resource's launch report said the cameras would ship in mid-September.1 In the UK the P2 was announced at £279.99 for the end of the month.3

Sensor
5.1 MP effective CCD, 1/1.8" (5.26 MP total)2
Lens
3.5x Zoom-Nikkor, 7.5 to 26.3 mm, 36 to 126 mm equiv., f/2.7 to 5.224
ISO
64 to 40047
Screen
2.5" TFT, 110,000 pixels; no optical viewfinder18
Shutter
8 s to 1/2000 s4
Wi-Fi
IEEE 802.11b/g, range up to 30 m by Nikon's figure2
Card and battery
SD card, about 16 MB built in · EN-EL8 Li-ion, about 190 shots by Nikon's CIPA figure2
Launch price
$399.95 (US list); the UK price was £279.9913

Why this one was interesting

A radio that stopped at your own computer

Imaging Resource's launch report called the wireless LAN the big hook that set the P1 and P2 apart in a crowded market.1 The P2 sends pictures only to Nikon's PictureProject software, either straight to a computer or through a wireless router, with a range of up to 30 metres depending on conditions; Nikon's release ties wireless printing to a PictBridge printer to the optional PD-10 adapter.421 Imaging Resource's review called this far less ambitious than Kodak's EasyShare One, which could reach Kodak's web gallery, but noted that the P2's radio is built in and speaks 802.11g where Kodak's spoke b.4 At the launch Imaging Resource was told that wireless use costs only about 20 per cent of battery life; in the review's own test a fresh battery was drained in a little over an hour of play, with the radio on about half the time.14

A large sensor, kept at five megapixels

TechRadar's reviewer liked the physically large 1/1.8-inch sensor and credited it with excellent noise performance.9 Anyone who wanted more pixels could buy the P1, which Pocket-lint called otherwise identical;7 TechRadar put it at about £55 more and Imaging Resource at about $60 to $70 more at retail.94 Imaging Resource also listed the other differences: 32 MB of built-in memory and a lowest sensitivity of ISO 50 on the P1, against 16 MB and ISO 64 on the P2.4

Scene modes with a help button

Nikon listed 16 scene modes, 11 of them with three effects each (Normal, Effect 1 and Effect 2).3 A tap of the Help button explains what each effect does, and Pocket-lint singled the help system out as a plus.47 Exposure control stopped short of full manual. Nikon's UK release lists aperture-priority with ten steps of aperture control, and Macworld and Imaging Resource both noted that there is no shutter priority.384

What was lost

Nikon dropped the optical viewfinder to fit a 2.5-inch screen. WiFi Planet would have liked both, so the screen could stay dark to save battery;6 Pocket-lint and Imaging Resource listed the omission among their cons.74 The screen has 110,000 pixels, a figure given by both Macworld and Imaging Resource.81 There is no stabilisation for stills: Imaging Resource's specification box says none, and the electronic vibration reduction works only when filming.14 Its reviewer leaned instead on the Best Shot Selector, which takes up to ten shots and keeps the least blurred, and said it worked well.4

Wireless is a separate position on the mode dial that behaves as full auto, which Imaging Resource disliked, wanting the exposure controls there too.4 No card comes in the box, as Imaging Resource and Pocket-lint both noted, and the built-in memory holds only about five Fine pictures by Nikon's count, five at full size in Imaging Resource's test.472

The dark: its weak point

The reviewers disagreed about noise. TechRadar called the noise performance excellent.9 Pocket-lint found intrusive noise in shadows even at ISO 100 with noise reduction switched on, and called it the one image-quality downside.7 Imaging Resource saw low to moderate noise at the lower sensitivities, moderately high at ISO 200 and more at ISO 400, yet said ISO 400 prints at 8 by 10 inches, a little soft and noisy, looked better than average and would probably do for wall or table display.4

Imaging Resource's low-light chart came out bright at all four sensitivities down to about a quarter of a foot-candle (2.7 lux). Below that ISO 64 and 100 darkened sharply, while ISO 200 and 400 still showed the target, and ISO 400 looked arguably usable.4 Autofocus worked unaided a little above that level, and well beyond it with the assist lamp.4 The longest exposure the camera allows is 8 seconds.4 The flash is the weaker partner: Imaging Resource's test at its closest range, 8 feet, did not quite light the target, needed 1.7 stops of exposure compensation indoors, and took about 6 seconds to recycle after a full-power shot.4 The photographs below were taken with real P2s; the settings come from each file's EXIF data, and the camera tops out at ISO 400.

A bridge at night with its lamps shining along the roadway
A bridge at night with its lamps shining along the roadway · ISO 200, 8 sRungbachduong · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
A hotel lobby with tall arched windows, planters and a patterned blue carpet
A hotel lobby with tall arched windows, planters and a patterned blue carpet · ISO 400, 1/60 sJoe Mabel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
The interior of a cathedral with rows of pews
The interior of a cathedral with rows of pews · ISO 200, 1.4 sJoe Mabel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
A gilded church iconostasis with rows of painted icons
A gilded church iconostasis with rows of painted icons · ISO 200, 0.9 sJoe Mabel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons

Real photographs taken with this camera, credited under each picture. The first is an 8-second night exposure at ISO 200; three of the four are by the same photographer, who uploaded most of the P2 pictures on Commons (see below).

Like the sound of it? See recent eBay sold listings for this camera ↗

On eBay right now

Live listings for this camera, supplied by eBay and updated automatically. We earn a commission if you buy through them.

The little wins

Shoot & Transfer

Each picture goes to the computer as it is taken, and PictureProject can build a slide show that grows while you shoot.4 Imaging Resource saw a one-megapixel picture arrive about 5 seconds after the shutter on a mixed b and g network, and full-size pictures at roughly 8 seconds each on a g-only network; Pocket-lint called it ideal for a party.47

D-Lighting, hidden in plain sight

This playback option saves a copy of a picture with the shadows lifted, a kind of fill flash after the fact. Imaging Resource found it subtle and warned that it makes noise in the lifted areas more visible, and that Nikon had buried it: you hold down the centre button of the multi-selector.4 Pocket-lint and TechRadar both praised it.79

Face AF

In Portrait (Face AF) the camera finds a face and focuses on it; Imaging Resource said the mode suits waist-up portraits of up to three people.4 Pocket-lint watched a face icon follow the subject around the screen.7

Red-eye fixed on the way to the card

After the flash, software in the camera hunts for red eyes and removes them before the file is saved; Imaging Resource said it did so very well, and TechRadar said it worked brilliantly.49 The price is time: Imaging Resource put the wait between shots in that mode at 6 to 7 seconds.4

How it drew the picture

In Imaging Resource's lab, strong detail ran to about 1,100 lines per picture height, with extinction near 1,450; the pictures looked slightly soft overall despite in-camera sharpening, with noise suppression smoothing fine detail such as hair. The corners were good, the colour pretty good though often slightly dark, the hues close to accurate, and barrel distortion measured 0.74 per cent at the wide end and almost none at the long end. Prints held up: usable at 11 by 14 inches and sharp at 8 by 10.4 Macworld, by contrast, found the pictures reasonably sharp and the colour acceptable if a little dark, but not that good beside other cameras at a similar price.8 Pocket-lint called the results exemplary, crisp and colourful;7 WiFi Planet's test pictures were generally sharp and properly exposed;6 TechRadar found the lens sharp in all its tests and the metering good in tricky light.9 Pocket-lint, Macworld and Imaging Resource each said the pictures ran a little dark; WiFi Planet and TechRadar found the exposure right.78469

The nine photographs below, mostly outdoors, run from 7.5 mm (36 mm equivalent) at the wide end to 26.3 mm (126 mm) at the long end, the focal length being each file's EXIF value.2 Commons held 6,880 files from this camera when we checked. In two random draws of 200 of them (our own sampling), 156 and 164 files (78 and 82 per cent) came from one uploader, credited on the files as Joe Mabel, and 175 and 182 (88 and 91 per cent) were shot at ISO 64, so the pool shows one photographer's habits more than the camera's range.11 None of the nine below is by that uploader.

A road climbing between green hills with a red car in the distance, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
23 mm · JarrahTree · Public domain · Commons
A tree in dry bushland with a large weaver-bird nest in its branches, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
26.3 mm · Joachim Huber from Switzerland · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Commons
A stone church with a rose window beside a brick tower and a bell tower, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
7.5 mm · MaryG90 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
A white bell gable against a dark, stormy sky above a dry hillside, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
9.1 mm · Hmollercl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
A red sun low over calm water with its reflection, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
26.3 mm · Joachim Huber · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Commons
A grey apartment building on a street corner under a blue sky, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
7.5 mm · Helge Høifødt · Public domain · Commons
Sugar-dusted beignets on a plate beside white flowers, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
8 mm · Marshawe · CC BY 3.0 · Commons
A pale stone relief memorial on a seafront promenade with a wreath at its foot, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
7.5 mm · Hugues Desponts · Public domain · Commons
An aerial view of excavated Roman ruins, a sample photo taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2
7.5 mm · Vilamuseu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Commons

Photos taken with this camera, from Wikimedia Commons, credited under each picture.

Where it let you down

The Wi-Fi is where the reviewers lost most time. Imaging Resource's network normally ran WPA encryption, which the P2 does not support, so it dropped to WEP, then found the camera wanted keys of exactly 5 or 13 characters and would not take the older 40-bit kind.4 Two of the reviewers lost time to firewalls: Imaging Resource named UDP port 5353 and TCP port 15740 as deal breakers, and WiFi Planet's camera only connected after a Nikon product manager pointed out a manual footnote about those settings.46 WiFi Planet's connection also failed from a deck about 30 feet from the router, through walls, and Pocket-lint called the set-up a fiddle, though transfer was surprisingly fast once it worked.67 Macworld called the set-up utility simple but noted that it has to be run again for each new network, since the camera cannot join one on its own.8

Speed was mixed. Imaging Resource clocked 3.6 seconds from power-on to the first shot, which it called slow, 2.32 seconds between large Fine JPEGs, a shutter lag of 0.52 second at wide and 0.64 second at telephoto with full autofocus, and 0.089 second prefocused.4 Continuous shooting ran at 2.2 frames a second for five frames,4 and a USB download ran at 461 KB a second, which Imaging Resource called slow by current standards.4 Nikon rates the battery at about 190 shots; Macworld got 201 in its battery test (run with the PC World Test Center) and rated battery life flawed.28 Imaging Resource called it somewhat short, especially with Wi-Fi in use, and advised buying a second battery.4

What the reviewers said

OutletDateVerdict
WiFi Planet14 Oct 2005Looked at the P2 mainly as a Wi-Fi device and found it a success on the whole, despite temporary set-up problems; pictures generally sharp and properly exposed; wanted an optical viewfinder as well.6
Pocket-lint13 Nov 20054.0 out of 5. For: good metering, good autofocus and exposure control, many shooting features, the Help system. Against: no optical viewfinder, no card supplied, Wi-Fi connection problems.7
Imaging Resource1 Feb 2006Image quality and resolution first-rate; a "Dave's Pick" for image quality, styling and features;54 the Wi-Fi adds to the price and is not as painless as it might be. Better than average high-ISO results and corner sharpness; flash range limited.4
Macworld4 May 2006Image quality rated good, battery life flawed. Advice: the unexceptional image quality and limited battery life fail to justify the price.8
TechRadarpage prints 12 Dec 2006 (original date unconfirmed)Stunning image quality and excellent lens sharpness, built-in Wi-Fi; only complaint that five megapixels may feel limiting; great performance and value. No score appears on the page we read.9

Where the sources disagree

The timeline

Should you buy one now?

Buy one if you want a small, easy five-megapixel Nikon whose pictures four of five contemporary reviewers liked, you will treat the Wi-Fi as a curiosity, and you are content to compose on a 2.5-inch screen.67498 It launched at $399.95;1 what it sells for now is a question for the sold listings. Before you bid, check these:

If you are wondering why cameras like this are being hunted down again, we tell that story once, in Pictures that never left the card; for the vocabulary, see our glossary. For an earlier five-megapixel Coolpix without the radio, see our Coolpix 5200 (2004).12

See recent sold prices on eBay ↗Shop on eBay ↗EN-EL8 batteries ↗

Sources

  1. Imaging Resource, Nikon announces two P-series digicams by Mike Tomkins (1 Sep 2005), with the Nikon Inc. press release of the same day: MSRP $399.95, available September 2005
  2. Nikon Corporation, circular letter 'COOLPIX P1/P2 Specifications' (September 2005; copy hosted by Techgage)
  3. PhotographyBLOG, Nikon Coolpix P1 and Nikon Coolpix P2 Announced (2 Sep 2005), including the Nikon UK press release and UK prices
  4. Imaging Resource, Nikon Coolpix P2 review with lab tests by Mike Pasini and Dave Etchells (review date 1 Feb 2006; news item 6 Feb 2006)
  5. Imaging Resource, Review posted for Nikon Coolpix P2 by Dave Etchells (news item, 6 Feb 2006)
  6. WiFi Planet, Nikon CoolPix P2 by Gerry Blackwell (14 Oct 2005; page later updated)
  7. Pocket-lint, Nikon Coolpix P2 digital camera by Doug Harman (13 Nov 2005; score 4.0 out of 5)
  8. Macworld, Nikon Coolpix P2 camera by Richard Baguley (4 May 2006; tested with the PC World Test Center)
  9. TechRadar, Nikon Coolpix P2 review, signed Matthew Richards (the page prints 'Published 12 December 2006' under a 'tech.co.uk staff' byline; we could not confirm the original publication date)
  10. Nikon Japan, COOLPIX P1/P2 quick start guide (Japanese PDF; the box contents list the USB cable UC-E6)
  11. Wikimedia Commons, Category: Taken with Nikon Coolpix P2 (6,880 files when we checked on 27 Oct 2026)
  12. Digicam Atlas, our own Nikon Coolpix 5200 retrospective (its data file cites the reviews listed there)

The camera photograph is by Linedwell (CC BY-SA 4.0); sample photographs are credited under each one, all via Wikimedia Commons. Links to eBay and Amazon are affiliate links.