Canon PowerShot G · on sale autumn 2001

The Canon PowerShot G2: four megapixels, ISO 50 and a screen that hides

Sold under the same name in Japan, the Americas and Europe.6

The Canon PowerShot G2 from the front, three-quarter view, with its lens cap on.
The Canon PowerShot G2 from the front, three-quarter view, with its lens cap on. Rama. · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · Commons

Canon's 2001 update to the G1 kept the lens, moved to four megapixels and added raw files. Three reviewers liked it in August 2001; DPReview, which scored it, still wrote that the viewfinder was lacking next to even the cheapest APS film cameras.

Launched
September 2001
Launch price
¥115,000 in Japan6 · US list price differs by source: USD 899 (Imaging Resource news, DPReview)42, USD 999 (Digital Camera Resource Page)3, USD 799 (Imaging Resource data sheet)5
Sensor
4 MP CCD
Lens
34–102 mm, 3×
Card
CompactFlash
Battery
BP-511, BP-512

Specs and sources

Updated · 6 cited sources · AI-assisted draft, checked against its sources by a person (how we work)

Canon PowerShot G2 specs: sensor, lens, battery, memory card and cable

The Canon PowerShot G2 came out in September 2001 as a 4 MP CCD compact with a 34–102 mm (35 mm equivalent) 3× zoom lens. It takes CompactFlash cards and runs on the BP-511 or BP-512 battery. Sources

Sensor
CCD, 1/1.8", 4 MP source
Lens
34–102 mm equivalent, 3× zoom source
Memory card
CompactFlash source
Battery
BP-511, BP-512 source
USB / A/V cable
AVC-DC100 Partly confirmed · all Canon cables

Meet the camera

Start with the screen. The G2's 1.8-inch LCD pops out of the back, swings to face forward, rotates up to 270 degrees, and can be folded back into the body face-in, which Imaging Resource liked because it protects the glass from fingerprints and scratches.1 DPReview listed the fold-out and twist screen, with its anti-reflective coating, among its strengths.2 It sat on a body all three described as solid: a champagne-coloured metal front, plastic elsewhere, and a larger grip than the G1's.213

Canon's museum gives the camera a September 2001 market date and a Japanese price of 115,000 yen.6 US prices in our sources do not agree. Imaging Resource's news item said the introductory list price matched the $899 the G1 launched at;4 the Digital Camera Resource Page printed $999;3 and Imaging Resource's own data sheet lists $799 as the retail price, with an availability date of 30 September 2001, in a field last updated in 2007;5 and DPReview's spec table gives a US street price of $899.2 We show them all rather than pick one. Weight depends on what is counted: Canon says about 425 grams for the body alone,6 while DPReview and Imaging Resource give 510 and 512 grams with battery, and card in IR's case.21

Sensor
4.0 MP CCD, 1/1.8", RGB colour filter61
Lens
3x, 7–21 mm (34–102 mm equiv.), f/2.0–2.56
ISO
Auto (50–100), 50, 100, 200, 4006
Screen
1.8" swivel LCD plus optical viewfinder (about 84% coverage)62
Files
JPEG or raw; shutter 15 s to 1/1000 s6
Flash
Built-in, plus a hot shoe for Canon Speedlites6
Card and battery
CompactFlash Type I or II · BP-511 (BP-512 optional)6
Launch price
¥115,000 in Japan6 · US list price differs by source: USD 899 (Imaging Resource news, DPReview)42, USD 999 (Digital Camera Resource Page)3, USD 799 (Imaging Resource data sheet)5

Why this one was interesting

Sharper than four megapixels explains

The lens was the G1's, and Imaging Resource still found the pictures sharper than the step from three to four megapixels would account for, suggesting that Canon had upgraded the image processing.1 In its resolution test the camera showed artifacts from about 700 lines per picture height, strong detail to at least 1,100 and extinction near 1,300.1 DPReview listed the resolution as among the best of its day and wrote that the lens was more than able to resolve a full four megapixels.2

An ISO setting below 100

The G2 offered ISO 50 (the G1's Auto setting already ranged from 50 to 100), which DPReview found very clean; at ISO 100 it saw slightly more noise, as coloured mottle.2 DPReview's table has dynamic range falling from 56 dB at ISO 50 to 40 dB at ISO 400.2 Canon says its Auto setting stays between ISO 50 and 100.6

Controls that grew up

DPReview wrote that a session with the new evaluative metering mode never needed the exposure compensation control.2 The camera gained a choice of three focus points, and manual focus enlarged the centre of the frame on the screen beside a distance scale.12

Raw, and room for a Microdrive

Raw files kept 10 bits of data, which DPReview counted a strength; it also said the supplied raw converter lacked functions.2 Imaging Resource counted eight raw frames on the supplied 32 MB card; the Digital Camera Resource Page and DPReview both counted ten.132 The slot took Type II cards, so IBM's Microdrive worked; DPReview timed a 1 GB drive against the supplied 32 MB card and a Lexar 12x card: the Microdrive was well ahead of the supplied card at saving large files and a little behind the Lexar, and the review called the camera's times with it a little slower but acceptable.2 Keller's review said Type II support set the G2 above Sony's Memory Stick DSC-S85.3

For the G line's later chapter, see our PowerShot G9 review (2007).

What stayed the same

The viewfinder was the weak spot. DPReview called it small, fine when the screen cannot be used and lacking next to the cheapest APS film cameras, and wished Canon had fitted a better one or an electronic one; it put coverage at about 84 per cent, which is Canon's figure too.26 Imaging Resource measured 86 per cent at wide angle and 83 per cent at telephoto.1

The dark: its weak point

The three reviewers did not agree about noise. Imaging Resource produced clear, bright, usable pictures down to about 1/16 foot-candle (0.67 lux) at all four ISO settings and called ISO 400 a little noisy, but with a small, tight grain.1 The Digital Camera Resource Page said things look grainy above ISO 100, with Auto and ISO 50 better.3 DPReview found ISO 50 very clean, ISO 100 slightly noisier and ISO 400 a little too noisy to be useful at full resolution.2 For long exposures, the Digital Camera Resource Page said a noise-reduction pass runs for shutter speeds slower than 1.3 seconds; its own four-second exposure, taken in fog, showed little noise.3 Imaging Resource also praised the slow-shutter noise reduction and wrote that the technology was apparently ported from Canon's EOS D30 SLR.1

The sample photographs below are all daylight shots. We found no free photograph taken with this camera whose EXIF data lets us show a verified night scene, so there is no low-light strip on this page.

Like that look? See recent eBay sold listings for this camera ↗

On eBay right now

Live listings for this camera, supplied by eBay and updated automatically. We earn a commission if you buy through them.

The little wins

Highlights that flash

In playback a small histogram appears, and overexposed areas of the picture flash black and white. Magnification went to 3x and 6x, from 2.5x and 5x on the G1, in a table Canon's technical manager supplied to Imaging Resource.1

A hot shoe and a lens ring

A hot shoe took Canon Speedlites, and the ring around the lens unscrews to take a lens adapter: Imaging Resource listed 0.8x wide-angle, 1.5x tele and a close-up lens, and the Digital Camera Resource Page gave the thread as 58 mm.13

Battery life that kept up

DPReview's own test gave the G2 3 hours 32 minutes and 355 shots, against 3 hours and 300 shots for the G1.2 The Digital Camera Resource Page said recharging via the camera's AC adapter takes about 80 minutes.3

A focus loupe

Holding the manual-focus button and pressing up or down moved the focus along a scale on the screen, with the centre of the picture enlarged. Imaging Resource loved it; the Digital Camera Resource Page, which still had some trouble focusing, noted that Fujifilm's FinePix 4900 and 6900 have the same feature.13

A computer-controlled camera

RemoteCapture software showed a live view from the camera on a computer; on the G2, Imaging Resource noted, the video output stayed live during capture and the camera's own shutter button worked, both limits on the G1.1

How it drew the picture

DPReview wrote that the camera loved colour, with deep blue skies as a recurring signature, and that its processing lifted dark areas slightly to keep shadow detail while avoiding a hard cut-off at the highlights.2 It also found jagged diagonal artifacts from sharpening or interpolation, which it said were not easy to see in everyday shots; it listed the artifacts among its cons and scored image quality 8.5 of 10.2 Imaging Resource saw excellent colour and a slight magenta tint in skin tones, measured about 0.51 per cent barrel distortion at wide angle (DPReview measured 1.1 per cent), and counted two or three faint pixels of colour fringing on either side of its chart lines.1 DPReview said purple fringing was far less than on the G1.2 Automatic white balance made Imaging Resource's indoor portrait very warm, though its incandescent and manual settings handled it.1

A cathedral with tall spires under a blue sky
Arnradigue · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
A formal garden with a round fountain in front of a yellow building
R. Möhler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
A tall palace tower with a green top behind trees and a fence
Josef Hoffmann · CC BY 2.5 · Commons
Green and red glass walls of a modern building
Héctor Rodríguez · CC BY 2.0 · Commons
A close-up of a sleeping guinea pig's fur
Murx Pickwick · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
Bare vines in a vineyard on dry brown soil
Leonid Mamchenkov · CC BY 2.0 · Commons
A rusty rail on a bed of grey gravel
Schorschi2 · Public domain · Commons
A bronze fox statue beside a river
Foxtod · CC0 · Commons
Grassy hills under a blue sky with a rocky ridge
Gurrea · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Commons

Photos taken with this camera, from Wikimedia Commons, credited under each picture.

Where it let you down

Speed was the sore point, and the sources disagree on how sore. Imaging Resource timed 7.2 seconds from power-on to first shot and called it somewhat slower than average, though it said its initial-production unit ran slower than Canon's specifications and that it would retest.1 DPReview timed 5.8 seconds for the lens to extend and called the startup the thing that crippled an otherwise quick camera.2 The Digital Camera Resource Page said it takes about four seconds, with no noticeable shutter lag.3 Imaging Resource's lag with full autofocus was 0.88 to 1.30 seconds, but only 0.095 seconds when the camera had been pre-focused.1

The build had weak points. DPReview and the Digital Camera Resource Page both disliked a flimsy door, the first on the connections and the second on the card slot; DPReview listed the tripod mount as poorly placed, and Imaging Resource noted that it sits so close to the battery door that changing batteries on a tripod is hard.231 Imaging Resource found both dials need a two-finger grip.1 The Digital Camera Resource Page listed the proprietary battery and the lack of optical zoom during movies among its dislikes, with price the main one.3 Macro drew a split: DPReview called it average, the Digital Camera Resource Page passed it with flying colours, and Imaging Resource found it great but said the flash overexposed at very short range.231

What the reviewers said in 2001

OutletDateVerdict
Imaging Resource16 Aug 2001Very highly recommended. Canon improved performance in virtually every area, at the same suggested retail price the G1 carried when first introduced.1
Digital Camera Resource Page16 Aug 2001; updated 13 May 2002Its favourite of the three 4-megapixel cameras it had tested. Dislikes: proprietary battery, no zoom in movies, price.3
DPReviewPage dated 27 Aug 2001Highly Recommended. Construction 8.5, features 9, image quality 8.5, lens and CCD 9, ease of use 9, value 9 out of 10.2

The timeline

Should you buy one now?

Buy one if you want a chunky, manual-control compact with raw files, a swivelling screen and a hot shoe, and you accept a slow start. It listed at $899 or $999 depending on source (and $799 on a later data sheet);435 what it sells for now is a question for the sold listings, not for us. Before you bid, check these:

If you are wondering why cameras like this are being hunted down again, we tell that story once, in Pictures that never left the card.

See recent sold prices on eBay ↗Shop on eBay ↗BP-511 battery ↗

Sources

  1. Imaging Resource, Canon PowerShot G2 review, twelve pages (first posted 16 Aug 2001; lab timings, resolution and low-light tests)
  2. DPReview, Canon PowerShot G2 review by Phil Askey (page dated 27 Aug 2001; its conclusion is quoted in Imaging Resource's news item of 16 Aug 2001)
  3. Digital Camera Resource Page, PowerShot G2 review by Jeff Keller (posted 16 Aug 2001, updated 13 May 2002; read in a December 2003 Internet Archive copy)
  4. Imaging Resource news item, Canon PowerShot G2 full review (16 Aug 2001: $899 introductory list price, quotes the other two reviews' conclusions)
  5. Imaging Resource data sheet, Canon PowerShot G2 (retail price field $799, availability 2001-09-30, price updated 2007-02-27)
  6. Canon Camera Museum, PowerShot G2 (marketed September 2001, 115,000 yen; specifications)

Camera photo by Rama (CC BY-SA 2.0 fr); other photographs are credited under each one, all via Wikimedia Commons. Links to eBay and Amazon are affiliate links.