Nikon Coolpix S series · on sale March 2010 · a retrospective

The Nikon Coolpix S3000: the cheap, cheerful, metal-bodied first digicam

In 2010 Nikon sold a 12-megapixel metal compact in seven colours for about $150. Reviewers said it was well made and easy to use, and that it was a step up from a camera phone.

The Nikon Coolpix S3000 in black, with its wrist strap.
The Nikon Coolpix S3000 in black, with its wrist strap. Io. Original uploader was Devi · Public domain · Commons

Meet the camera

It is small, flat and a little plain. Trusted Reviews called it exceptionally small, at 94 by 56 millimetres and 19 thick, and very light at 116 grams including battery and card, with an attractive, well-finished all-metal body and a flush-folding lens that suits a pocket or handbag on a night out.2 It came in seven colours, from champagne silver and magenta to green, blue, orange, red and matt black,2 and Cameralabs noted a magenta review sample so bright that it called it eye-watering.3

Imaging Resource listed it as shipping from March 2010 at $150.1 Cameralabs described it as the successor to the COOLPIX S220, with a larger screen, two more megapixels and a longer zoom, mostly at the wide-angle end.3 Trusted Reviews priced it in Britain at about £90 and called it essentially what you would get by crossing the S570 with the older S225.2

Sensor
12 MP CCD, 1/2.3"1
Lens
4x, 27–108 mm equiv., f/3.2–5.91
ISO
160 to 1600 automatic, 3200 manual1
Screen
2.7", 230,000 dots, no viewfinder1
Battery
EN-EL10, about 220 shots (CIPA)1
Card
SD, 47 MB built in1
Size
94 × 56 × 19 mm, 116 g1
Launch price
$1501

Why this one was interesting

Not much, on purpose

PhotographyBLOG called it a stylish but basic point-and-shoot aimed at snapshooters, with a pared-down approach it found refreshing. Its reviewer thought it hard to find too much fault with a £100, $150 camera that was very slim, light and made of metal not plastic.4 Trusted Reviews said it was a very simple camera designed for ease of use rather than creative versatility, with only five main shooting modes, and a main menu of seven adjustable things.2 PhotographyBLOG's summary: a cheap and more than cheerful step-up from a camera-phone or first-ever digicam.4

Was it a new chip or lens?

No. It was a 12-megapixel CCD with a 4x lens whose wide end reached 27 mm.1 The lens had no mechanical stabilisation. Imaging Resource said it relied on a software approach to camera shake,1 Trusted Reviews called digital stabilisation less effective and said that with the short focal length it was not really a problem,2 and PhotographyBLOG called the electronic system ineffective.4

No HD, no close-up

The S3000 recorded only 640 by 480 video at 30 frames per second, Trusted Reviews pointed out, unlike almost every compact launched in the previous six months, which had HD.2 PhotographyBLOG called the VGA movies dated and the macro distance a disappointing 8 centimetres.4

The same year's Canon of this class is in our SD1400 IS retrospective, and the Sony of a few years earlier is in our W55 retrospective.

The pictures, honestly

Reviewers disagreed on how good they were. Trusted Reviews called image quality good for the price and surprisingly good, but noted it was noisy at high ISO, with no distortion correction.2 Cameralabs found the S3000 matched the more expensive Canon IXUS 105 pixel for pixel and outperformed it in outdoor tests, and also beat the Sony W310, but said the Canon was worth the extra for indoor and dusk shooting, where the Nikon's low-light and high-ISO results could not compare.3 PhotographyBLOG was less excited: solid rather than spectacular, with heavy noise reduction smearing fine detail even at base ISO, though still sharp at the centre, accurate colour in natural light, and an auto white balance that struggled indoors, with a manual option as a pleasant surprise.4

A church interior
A church interior · ISO 1600Àlex · CC BY-SA 3.0 es · Commons
A brick cellar lit by lamps
A brick cellar lit by lamps · ISO 1000Superniky86 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
A stuffed eagle in a glass case
A stuffed eagle in a glass case · ISO 800User:Kelsey0 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
A fly agaric specimen under museum light
A fly agaric specimen under museum light · ISO 800User:Kelsey0 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons

Real photographs taken with this camera. The sensitivity shown is recorded in each file's own EXIF data.

A tram station platform, at ISO 800.
A tram station platform, at ISO 800. · ISO 800 Bigbossfarin · CC0 · Commons

Like that look? See what S3000s have recently sold for on eBay ↗

On eBay right now

Live listings for this camera, supplied by eBay and updated automatically. We earn a commission if you buy through them.

The little wins

A real metal body for the money

All-metal construction and excellent build quality were the S3000's best points, Trusted Reviews said.2 PhotographyBLOG agreed that metal, not plastic, was notable at its price.4

A manual white balance

PhotographyBLOG was pleasantly surprised that an otherwise basic model offered manual white balance.4

The S3000 in black.The S3000 in black. · Io. Original uploader was Devi · Public domain · Commons

Seven colours

Seven colours were offered, from champagne silver to magenta.2

Face and smile detection

Cameralabs listed scene recognition, face detection, AF tracking and smile detection among its features for a basic camera.3 Trusted Reviews found its face recognition good, detecting faces even in poor light or turned partly away.2

A smooth zoom

PhotographyBLOG found the zoom smooth for a power zoom.4

Where it let you down

Trusted Reviews found the controls engraved silver on silver, hard to see in good light and almost invisible in dim light, a start-up that looked like two seconds but was nearer four before the camera was ready, shot-to-shot of about 2.5 seconds and no audio cue in continuous mode.2 Imaging Resource rated the battery at 220 shots.1 Cameralabs found the screen much less bright and vibrant than the Canon's, with a narrower viewing angle.3

Sample photo taken with this camera
Fascinating Universe · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
Sample photo taken with this camera
Gnaraloo Turtle Conservation Program · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons
Sample photo taken with this camera
PeterSkuce · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Commons
Sample photo taken with this camera
Fotokannan · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Commons

Photos taken with this camera, from Wikimedia Commons, credited under each picture.

What the reviewers said in 2010

OutletDateVerdict
Trusted Reviews30 Jul 2010A good low-cost ultra-compact: short on features and mediocre in speed, but well made, easy to use and good-looking, with image quality good for the price.2
Cameralabs2010Extraordinarily good value against the Canon IXUS 105; better outdoors, worse in low light; for those who prize image quality, looks and value over control.3
PhotographyBLOG8 Sep 2010Stylish but basic and half the price of the S4000; solid rather than spectacular pictures with heavy noise reduction.4

The timeline

Should you buy one now?

Buy one if you want a first digicam that is cheap, metal and simple, and you will shoot in daylight and share small. It launched at $150;1 what it sells for now is a question for the sold listings, not for us. Before you bid, check these:

If you are wondering why cameras like this are being hunted down again, we tell that story once, in Pictures that never left the card.

See recent sold prices on eBay ↗Shop on eBay ↗Replacement battery ↗

New to the jargon (CCD, ISO, xD cards, IXUS vs ELPH)? Read our plain-English digicam glossary.

Sources

  1. Imaging Resource, Nikon Coolpix S3000 overview and specifications (2010)
  2. Trusted Reviews, Nikon CoolPix S3000 review by Cliff Smith (30 Jul 2010)
  3. Cameralabs, Nikon COOLPIX S3000 review by Gordon Laing (2010)
  4. PhotographyBLOG, Nikon Coolpix S3000 review by Mark Goldstein (8 Sep 2010)

Camera photo by Io (public domain); other photographs are credited under each one, all via Wikimedia Commons. Links to eBay and Amazon are affiliate links.